But it did make me think about the inverse. This is supposed to be something that we do for fun and I'm sorry that expressing my opinion is somehow ruining yours. I just qualified it and put it in context so there was room for other opinions. I can of course support my opinions and have previously done so. It found support for a number of different viewpoints, depending on selected anchoring references. Of course, I did spend a lot of time researching this very subject and have shown most of my work in another post. My AD&D is certainly not purer or better than yours and I do not think so. I didn't shout you down and I'm sorry if you thought I did. I understand it but it is not the only valid interpretation and I don't like people being shouted down. I just put it in context so other people, who where using a different perspective, could understand the source of the different interpretation. You made an absolute and unqualified statement that reflected your past discussion framework but would be confusing to people who were not aware of them. I'm not sure why this offended you so much. So please get off your high horse, because I would love to turn it into quicksand with you sitting on it right now!Īnd I would love for you to show me precisely (bar a clear exception to the rules of illusion found in the ToEE) where early pure D&d had illusions actually turning people to stone? Because that’s BS frankly. And before the late edition, we played early edition PHB only Ad&d first edition.
We are actually playing early second edition now, so stuff that in your hat. We don’t actually just play late edition first edition. This work is copyright and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International Licence by David Morgan-Mar.You know I wish you would stop forcing this narrative on me about playing Late Edition vs early edition Ad&d, with the undertone that your early edition Ad&d is some how purer.
More comics I host: The Prisoner of Monty Hall | Lightning Made of Owls | Square Root of Minus Garfield | iToons | Comments on a Postcard | Awkward Fumbles My blogs: (daily updates) | 100 Proofs that the Earth is a Globe (science!) | Carpe DMM (long form posts) | Snot Block & Roll (food reviews) My comics: Irregular Webcomic! | Darths & Droids | Eavesdropper | Planet of Hats | The Dinosaur Whiteboard | mezzacotta This material is presented in accordance with the LEGO ® Fair Play Guidelines. Which does not sponsor, authorise, or endorse this site. LEGO ® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group of companies, Or odd personality disorders, but perhaps it was just as well that she never flipped through the latter pages of the DMG. My mother was never worried about any of those foundless allegations that Dungeons & Dragons led to any sort of satanic behaviour Of the Advanced Dungeons & Dragons Dungeon Master's Guide (1st edition), herewith reproduced in all its prostitutional glory:
Yes, they are from the infamous random harlot table, found on page 192 Vegetables, to religious articles and furnishings, to harlots. Ishmael's insults come straight from that fantastic source of random descriptions of all sorts of things: from herbs, spices, and medicinal
0 kommentar(er)
